어떤 스킬인가요?
월 구독으로 받을지 사용량에 따라 받을지 고민할 때 활용합니다. 고객이 얻는 가치와 운영 비용을 함께 살펴보고 요금제마다 어떤 기능을 넣을지 검토합니다.
현재 비용과 실제 사용 패턴을 넣어야 현실적인 비교가 가능합니다. 가격 숫자를 바로 확정하기보다 고객 인터뷰에서 확인할 질문과 검증할 가설도 요청하세요. AI가 제시한 가격을 시장에서 검증된 적정 가격으로 받아들이지는 않습니다.
pricing · 스킬 지원 에이전트
제품의 과금 기준, 요금제 묶음과 무료 제공 범위를 비교해 정리합니다.
월 구독으로 받을지 사용량에 따라 받을지 고민할 때 활용합니다. 고객이 얻는 가치와 운영 비용을 함께 살펴보고 요금제마다 어떤 기능을 넣을지 검토합니다.
현재 비용과 실제 사용 패턴을 넣어야 현실적인 비교가 가능합니다. 가격 숫자를 바로 확정하기보다 고객 인터뷰에서 확인할 질문과 검증할 가설도 요청하세요. AI가 제시한 가격을 시장에서 검증된 적정 가격으로 받아들이지는 않습니다.
pricing으로 문서 작성 서비스의 무료·개인·팀 요금제 구성을 비교해줘. 실제 운영 비용과 고객 사용량은 아래와 같아. 과금 기준과 고객에게 확인할 질문을 제안해줘.
받을 수 있는 결과요금제 구성과 검증 질문
스킬 지원 에이전트가 필요합니다. 비용·시장 자료와 고객 조사를 바탕으로 최종 가격을 결정합니다.
현재 사용 중인 스킬 지원 에이전트에 아래 요청을 붙여넣으세요. SKILL.md만 복사하면 보조 파일이 빠질 수 있어요.
https://github.com/coreyhaines31/marketingskills 에서 skills/pricing 스킬을 현재 에이전트의 스킬 폴더에 설치해줘. SKILL.md와 이 스킬이 참조하는 scripts·references·assets와 공통 파일을 함께 유지하고, 필요한 실행 환경과 추가 연결을 확인한 뒤 알려줘. 설치가 끝나면 pricing 스킬을 인식하는지 확인해줘.
“pricing 스킬을 사용해줘. 입력 자료: 고객군·비용·제품 가치·사용 패턴”처럼 요청하세요. 위의 예시를 내 자료에 맞게 바꿔도 좋아요.
예상 결과는 ‘요금제 구성과 검증 질문’입니다. 필요한 내용이 포함됐는지 확인하세요. 입력 자료의 사실·숫자와 결과를 대조하고, 부족한 부분을 이어서 요청하세요.
제작자 원본 2026-10-04 확인 · 설치 안내 2026-10-04 확인 · 실제 설치·실행 미검증
모델 사용 요금과 연결 앱 요금은 이용 중인 서비스의 정책을 따릅니다.
설치 안내 출처--- name: pricing description: "When the user wants help with pricing decisions, packaging, or monetization strategy. Also use when the user mentions 'pricing,' 'pricing tiers,' 'freemium,' 'free trial,' 'packaging,' 'price increase,' 'value metric,' 'Van Westendorp,' 'willingness to pay,' 'monetization,' 'how much should I charge,' 'my pricing is wrong,' 'pricing page,' 'annual vs monthly,' 'per seat pricing,' 'should I offer a free plan,' 'pricing page teardown,' 'pricing page audit,' 'is my pricing page AI-readable,' or 'can AI read my pricing.' Use this whenever someone is figuring out what to charge, how to structure their plans, or wants to audit a pricing page (for humans and for the AI agents that shortlist tools). For in-app upgrade screens, see paywalls. For offer construction (bonuses, guarantees, value framing, naming) on services/courses/coaching/high-ticket B2B, see offers." metadata: version: 2.1.2 --- # Pricing Strategy You are an expert in SaaS pricing and monetization strategy. Your goal is to help design pricing that captures value, drives growth, and aligns with customer willingness to pay. ## Before Starting **Check for product marketing context first:** If `.agents/product-marketing.md` exists (or `.claude/product-marketing.md`, or the legacy `product-marketing-context.md` filename, in older setups), read it before asking questions. Use that context and only ask for information not already covered or specific to this task. Gather this context (ask if not provided): ### 1. Business Context - What type of product? (SaaS, marketplace, e-commerce, service) - What's your current pricing (if any)? - What's your target market? (SMB, mid-market, enterprise) - What's your go-to-market motion? (self-serve, sales-led, hybrid) ### 2. Value & Competition--- name: pricing description: "When the user wants help with pricing decisions, packaging, or monetization strategy. Also use when the user mentions 'pricing,' 'pricing tiers,' 'freemium,' 'free trial,' 'packaging,' 'price increase,' 'value metric,' 'Van Westendorp,' 'willingness to pay,' 'monetization,' 'how much should I charge,' 'my pricing is wrong,' 'pricing page,' 'annual vs monthly,' 'per seat pricing,' 'should I offer a free plan,' 'pricing page teardown,' 'pricing page audit,' 'is my pricing page AI-readable,' or 'can AI read my pricing.' Use this whenever someone is figuring out what to charge, how to structure their plans, or wants to audit a pricing page (for humans and for the AI agents that shortlist tools). For in-app upgrade screens, see paywalls. For offer construction (bonuses, guarantees, value framing, naming) on services/courses/coaching/high-ticket B2B, see offers." metadata: version: 2.1.2 --- # Pricing Strategy You are an expert in SaaS pricing and monetization strategy. Your goal is to help design pricing that captures value, drives growth, and aligns with customer willingness to pay. ## Before Starting **Check for product marketing context first:** If `.agents/product-marketing.md` exists (or `.claude/product-marketing.md`, or the legacy `product-marketing-context.md` filename, in older setups), read it before asking questions. Use that context and only ask for information not already covered or specific to this task. Gather this context (ask if not provided): ### 1. Business Context - What type of product? (SaaS, marketplace, e-commerce, service) - What's your current pricing (if any)? - What's your target market? (SMB, mid-market, enterprise) - What's your go-to-market motion? (self-serve, sales-led, hybrid) ### 2. Value & Competition - What's the primary value you deliver? - What alternatives do customers consider? - How do competitors price? ### 3. Current Performance - What's your current conversion rate? - What's your ARPU and churn rate? - Any feedback on pricing from customers/prospects? ### 4. Goals - Optimizing for growth, revenue, or profitability? - Moving upmarket or expanding downmarket? --- ## Pricing Fundamentals ### The Three Pricing Axes **1. Packaging** — What's included at each tier? - Features, limits, support level - How tiers differ from each other **2. Pricing Metric** — What do you charge for? - Per user, per usage, flat fee - How price scales with value **3. Price Point** — How much do you charge? - The actual dollar amounts - Perceived value vs. cost ### Value-Based Pricing Price should be based on value delivered, not cost to serve: - **Customer's perceived value** — The ceiling - **Your price** — Between alternatives and perceived value - **Next best alternative** — The floor for differentiation - **Your cost to serve** — Only a baseline, not the basis **Key insight:** Price between the next best alternative and perceived value. **Don't anchor on the wrong things:** - **Not competitor-based** — matching a competitor's price copies their strategy, not their economics. It's a data point, not a target. - **Not cost-based** — cost is a floor, never the basis. Value + differentiation set the price. --- ## Initial Pricing — "Pick a Price You Can Learn From" The frameworks below (value metrics, tiers, Van Westendorp) are for optimizing a price. **On day one you don't have a price to optimize — you have a bet to place.** The goal of your first price is *learning*, not precision. Pick a number, ship it, and let real buyers tell you if it's wrong. ### The $10 / $100 / $1,000 rule of thumb When you have nothing to go on, start with the order of magnitude that matches who you serve: - **~$10/mo** — prosumer / individual, high volume, low touch - **~$100/mo** — SMB / team tool, the SaaS default - **~$1,000/mo** — mid-market / business-critical / sales-assisted Pick the bucket by **who the customer is and how much value you deliver**, then start near the round number. You can move within the bucket fast once you have signal. ### Avoid the $9 trap Resist the urge to price ultra-low (e.g. **$9/mo**) to reduce friction. Ultra-low pricing: - Creates **false traction** — signups that look like validation but come from people who'd never pay a real price - **Traps you** — it's far harder to raise a price 5–10x later than to have started higher, and your cheapest customers churn most and complain loudest (see [references/pricing-models.md](references/pricing-models.md) on low-price retention) Round-and-slightly-higher beats clever-and-cheap. ### "Just charge $50 and see what happens" When early Intercom agonized over pricing, Jason Fried's advice was essentially: **just charge $50 and see what happens.** Stop modeling; get a real signal. If people pay without flinching, raise it. If nobody bites, you've learned something for the cost of a week, not a quarter. **For the eight ways to structure how you charge (flat, usage, tier, user, feature, credit, outcome, hybrid) and the value/price ratio:** See [references/pricing-models.md](references/pricing-models.md). --- ## Value Metrics ### What is a Value Metric? The value metric is what you charge for—it should scale with the value customers receive. **Good value metrics:** - Align price with value delivered - Are easy to understand - Scale as customer grows - Are hard to game ### Common Value Metrics | Metric | Best For | Example | |--------|----------|---------| | Per user/seat | Collaboration tools | Slack, Notion | | Per usage | Variable consumption | AWS, Twilio | | Per feature | Modular products | HubSpot add-ons | | Per contact/record | CRM, email tools | Mailchimp | | Per transaction | Payments, marketplaces | Stripe | | Flat fee | Simple products | Basecamp | ### Choosing Your Value Metric Ask: "As a customer uses more of [metric], do they get more value?" - If yes → good value metric - If no → price doesn't align with value **The value metric picks the pricing model.** Once you know what scales with value, choose how to charge on it — flat, usage, tier, user, feature, credit, outcome, or a hybrid. See [references/pricing-models.md](references/pricing-models.md). --- ## Tier Structure Overview ### Good-Better-Best Framework **Good tier (Entry):** Core features, limited usage, low price **Better tier (Recommended):** Full features, reasonable limits, anchor price **Best tier (Premium):** Everything, advanced features, 2-3x Better price ### Tier Differentiation - **Feature gating** — Basic vs. advanced features - **Usage limits** — Same features, different limits - **Support level** — Email → Priority → Dedicated - **Access** — API, SSO, custom branding **For detailed tier structures and persona-based packaging**: See [references/tier-structure.md](references/tier-structure.md) --- ## Pricing Research ### Van Westendorp Method Four questions that identify acceptable price range: 1. Too expensive (wouldn't consider) 2. Too cheap (question quality) 3. Expensive but might consider 4. A bargain Analyze intersections to find optimal pricing zone. ### MaxDiff Analysis Identifies which features customers value most: - Show sets of features - Ask: Most important? Least important? - Results inform tier packaging **For detailed research methods**: See [references/research-methods.md](references/research-methods.md) --- ## When to Raise Prices ### Signs It's Time **Market signals:** - Competitors have raised prices - Prospects don't flinch at price - "It's so cheap!" feedback **Business signals:** - Very high conversion rates (>40%) - Very low churn (<3% monthly) - Strong unit economics **Product signals:** - Significant value added since last pricing - Product more mature/stable ### Price Increase Strategies 1. **Grandfather existing** — New price for new customers only 2. **Delayed increase** — Announce 3-6 months out 3. **Tied to value** — Raise price but add features 4. **Plan restructure** — Change plans entirely ### Rollout Methodology A price change is a rollout, not a switch you flip. Sequence it to de-risk: 1. **Test on new customers first.** Raise the price only for *new* signups and watch conversion. New customers have no anchor and no relationship at stake, so they give you a clean read on whether the market accepts the number — before you touch a single existing account. 2. **Don't reflexively grandfather forever.** Grandfathering feels kind, but it can leave enormous money on the table. Run the math: a customer paying **$50/mo** who *should* be at **$250/mo** is a **$2,400/yr** gap — and $200/mo you're subsidizing indefinitely across your whole base. Grandfather as a *transition* (a grace period), not a permanent exemption. 3. **Roll out small, then gradually.** Move **5–10%** of existing customers to the new price first. Watch churn and support volume for a cycle, then expand in staggered waves. A staggered rollout contains the blast radius and gives you an off-ramp if churn spikes. 4. **Communicate the *why*, months ahead, with a generous offer.** Tell customers why the price is changing (usually: more value shipped) well in advance. Soften it: lock-in-the-old-price-if-you-upgrade-to-annual-now, an extended grace window, or a one-time credit. Advance notice + a generous option converts a resentment moment into a loyalty one. Expect — and accept — some churn. The customers most likely to leave over a justified increase are usually your least-profitable, highest-support, most price-sensitive accounts. --- ## Pricing Page Best Practices ### Above the Fold - Clear tier comparison table - Recommended tier highlighted - Monthly/annual toggle - Primary CTA for each tier ### Common Elements - Feature comparison table - Who each tier is for - FAQ section - Annual discount callout (17-20%) - Money-back guarantee - Customer logos/trust signals ### Pricing Psychology - **Anchoring:** Show higher-priced option first - **Decoy effect:** Middle tier should be best value - **Charm pricing:** $49 vs. $50 (for value-focused) - **Round pricing:** $50 vs. $49 (for premium) --- ## Pricing Page Teardown When someone wants to audit an existing pricing *page* for **clarity, transparency, and AI-readability** (not the pricing strategy itself, and not conversion-rate optimization — that's `cro`), run a **teardown** that scores it across two axes and returns prioritized fixes: - **Human buyer experience** — value-prop clarity, plan differentiation, cognitive load, trust signals, pricing psychology, and price transparency. - **AI-agent readiness** — whether the LLMs and agents that increasingly shortlist and compare tools can actually read and quote your pricing: machine-readable prices (not locked in an image or behind "Contact us"), extractable FAQ/objection coverage, per-tier depth stated in text, and structured data. Buyers now ask ChatGPT/Perplexity/Claude "what's the best X and what does it cost?" *before* visiting — a pricing page an agent can't parse loses deals you never see. **Fast check — the "paste test":** give the pricing URL to a browsing-capable AI (Perplexity, ChatGPT with search, Claude with web) — or paste the rendered page text — and ask "what are the plans and prices?" A clean miss means agents fetching your page will struggle too (a heuristic, not proof every agent fails). The AI-readiness fixes are usually high-impact, low-effort (put prices in text, add `Offer` schema). Hand implementation to **schema** (Product/Offer JSON-LD) and **ai-seo** (extractability, AI-bot access, `llms.txt`). **For the full 10-dimension rubric, scoring, and report template:** See [references/pricing-page-teardown.md](references/pricing-page-teardown.md). *(AI-agent-readiness lens adapted from Kyle Poyar / Growth Unhinged.)* --- ## Pricing Checklist ### Before Setting Prices - [ ] Defined target customer personas - [ ] Researched competitor pricing - [ ] Identified your value metric - [ ] Conducted willingness-to-pay research - [ ] Mapped features to tiers ### Pricing Structure - [ ] Chosen number of tiers - [ ] Differentiated tiers clearly - [ ] Set price points based on research - [ ] Created annual discount strategy - [ ] Planned enterprise/custom tier --- ## Task-Specific Questions 1. What pricing research have you done? 2. What's your current ARPU and conversion rate? 3. What's your primary value metric? 4. Who are your main pricing personas? 5. Are you self-serve, sales-led, or hybrid? 6. What pricing changes are you considering? --- ## Related Skills - **churn-prevention**: For cancel flows, save offers, and reducing revenue churn - **cro**: For optimizing pricing page conversion - **ai-seo**: For making the pricing page extractable/citable by AI (the teardown's AI-agent-readiness axis) - **schema**: For Product/Offer structured data so machines can read your tiers and prices - **copywriting**: For pricing page copy - **marketing-psychology**: For pricing psychology principles - **ab-testing**: For testing pricing changes - **revops**: For deal desk processes and pipeline pricing - **sales-enablement**: For proposal templates and pricing presentations
Original skill: coreyhaines31/marketingskills/skills/pricing/SKILL.md Source: https://github.com/coreyhaines31/marketingskills/blob/dda3841f0b294e01e93b1541486beefbfab0915e/skills/pricing/SKILL.md License: MIT MIT License Copyright (c) 2025 Corey Haines Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions: The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software. THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.
SKILL.md 본문입니다. 원문에서 참조하는 스크립트·보조 파일은 원본 패키지에 포함되어 있습니다.